Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 1:10 AM |
I think this thread is a desperate attempt to get some of the topboys on here to think you're cool and fab. It's like Peter raving about Chaz and Dave like he's the only one who's heard them. Did you know Laurel did you, did you have beers with Hardy did you???? Saw them way back when did you???
|
|
Anonymous
(Login singlehound)
TopBoy |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 1:12 AM |
"I think this thread is a desperate attempt to get some of the topboys on here to think you're cool and fab. It's like Peter raving about Chaz and Dave like he's the only one who's heard them. Did you know Laurel did you, did you have beers with Hardy did you???? Saw them way back when did you???" But Laurel and Hardy are great 
|
|
Anonymous
(Login Calicowall)
TopBoy |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 1:12 AM |
the music box is ace. schlong johnson is an old .orger using a new login. or did you already know that?
|
|
AnonymousAnonymous
(Login lytias)
TopBoy |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 1:17 AM |
The real genius is Chaplin in my eyes, but that's another story...
|
|
Anonymous
(Login S********n) |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 1:17 AM |
Ohh what about me, I'm really into "The upper hand" I have every episode on VHS WITH! the adverts included on their first run. I get together with the bloke who plays Tom Wheatley every saturday to shoot pool down at the old 106. Can I be cool to, oh please pick me. Wah.
Can I get a WITM8 or a Lee hola-back girl. PLEASE!!!
|
|
Anonymous
(Login Calicowall)
TopBoy |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 1:20 AM |
i note you didnt disagree with me. charlie chaplin is boring. laurel and hardy were genius. easy.
|
|
Anonymous
(Login S********n) |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 1:25 AM |
Faxing no way slimline. Chaplin was the magnet man. Did you see that clip where he's on the front of a steamer knocking the old sleepers off the track. He really did that in one take.
You're so vain.
|
|
Anonymous
(Login Calicowall)
TopBoy |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 1:27 AM |
youre boring and hiding behind a pseudo login. buster keaton was better thatn chaplin as well. chaplin and harold lloyd occupy the same space. the bluffers guide to film comedy. for people who watch but dont see.
|
|
Anonymous
(Login S********n) |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 1:30 AM |
You are the one who is being boring. How dare you put me down and claim to know all. Just becasue you have the 1 and o on me dosn't make you cool mite. I just happen to like Chaplin, he wasn't Jewish just like Steven Gerrard.
|
|
Anonymous
(Login Calicowall)
TopBoy |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 1:34 AM |
youre a bluffer. your argument is on the same terms as saying the first car ford made is the best cos no one had done it before - its a bluffers argument and completely ignores the evolution of the art form. its utterly crass.
Chsrlie Chaplin was a good end of pier act who happened to be in the right place at the right time.
|
|
Anonymous
(Login S********n) |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 1:36 AM |
Oh come on, Chaplin had range and managed to forge a career in the talkies as well as the darkies. Don't knock a man of pure greatness until you've grown into those trousers.
|
|
AnonymousAnonymous
(Login lytias)
TopBoy |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 1:31 AM |
Strong point. Laurel and Hardy are piss funny. I watched them on TV with my two little cousins when I lived in Austria. Oh, the laughs! When Hardy would walk head first into a closed door or be really rude to some some shop keeper!
I still think Chaplin was into something special in a kind of odd way.
He played and self produced himself until his death, at merely 70 years old I think
|
|
AnonymousAnonymous
(Login lytias)
TopBoy |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 1:33 AM |
Laurel and Hardy are basically COMEDY whereas Chaplin is TRAGI-COMEDY, which is very different...
|
|
Anonymous
(Login Calicowall)
TopBoy |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 1:40 AM |
Charlie Chaplin is overrated. His films are dull and benefit from being amongst the first mass audience motion pictures. Basically hes pretty okay but compare him to Keaton and he is nowhere near.
|
|
Anonymous
(Login S********n) |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 1:47 AM |
Nah you're just plumming for Keaton because it's older. You're a timelord ponce who only likes things that are old and older than the thing they are older than.
You probably really like Wings unless you're comparing them to the Beatles and then suddenly they are shit but how could that be? Wings were never shit.
|
|
Anonymous
(Login Calicowall)
TopBoy |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
Score 5.0 (1 person) | September 5 2009, 1:51 AM |
See you are exposing your bluffers stance - Keaton made movies after Chaplin. SYHTFOLT.
He was simply a better choreographer of his set pieces. All Chaplin did was kick people up the arse. Big deal.
And Chaplin was a paedo.
|
|
Shaun
(Login Calicowall)
TopBoy |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 1:57 AM |
and no i didnt score my own post.
|
|
AnonymousAnonymous
(Login lytias)
TopBoy |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 2:00 AM |
|
Shaun
(Login Calicowall)
TopBoy |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 2:01 AM |
i knew that but didnt want to upset you.
and he was a dirty old man. which wiki probably leave alone.
|
|
AnonymousAnonymous
(Login lytias)
TopBoy |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 2:02 AM |
|
Anonymous
(Login Calicowall)
TopBoy |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 2:07 AM |
Its well known. he left america cos he married a girl about 14 years old or something. bad business. his knighthood was very controversial at the time.
|
|
Anonymous
(Login S********n) |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 2:11 AM |
It's like Milburn and the Arctic Monkeys all over again. You're only picking Keaton because Chaplin became more famous. You're just jealous. Why don't you just prove it by saying you think Harold Lloyd was better than Keaton?
|
|
Anonymous
(Login Calicowall)
TopBoy |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 2:14 AM |
schlong you are so shit that this is the last post i will ever regale you with.
night night.
|
|
Anonymous
(Login S********n) |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 2:15 AM |
Ha you sound just like Lytias you big baby. Get over yourself. I bet you fucking love a game of cricket.
|
|
Anonymous
(Login lytias)
TopBoy |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 3:00 AM |
Nah, you're being unecessarily mean there Slong. And don't call me a big baby.
|
|
Anonymous
(Login S********n) |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 3:25 AM |
Who are you?
Oh yeah you're the cunt caller. Thanks for that.
|
|
Anonymous
(Login S********n) |
Re: Laurel and Hardy
No score for this post | September 5 2009, 3:56 AM |
Do you know what it's like to be called a cunt Lytias? It's horrible, it makes you feel like you've just been called something awful went a cunt is actually a pretty beautiful thing. I didn't call you a big baby I called Conkerwall a big baby.
|
|
No comments:
Post a Comment